LUNA Lab
EN
Help
Navigation
Choose language
Print viewPDFMarkdown (.md)Text (.txt)Export this page’s content and sources.

Research goals, literature and strategy

Find a task, follow the steps, and check the result. Guidance for researchers and administrators, in both languages.

Reviewed 2026-10-12 · 50 topics

Search these guides in Korean or English. This does not search private research materials.

Choose another topic

Paper goals, literature alerts, application advice, personal budgets and recurring strategy reviews.

Reviewed · 2026-10-12

On this page · 44

1. Set a personal paper goal

Open Today’s research → Research suggestions in the Reports and actions row → + Paper goal. Select the lab and related projects, research question, venue and year, and your submission target date. Record available data, GPU time, collaboration constraints and PI/researcher perspective under Research time, resources and writing criteria. Goals are private and grant no additional source access. Use the Paper targets tab to set annual targets by category; legacy ambitious and other targets remain unclassified. Targets do not mean acceptance or publication; update the actual stage yourself.

Back to search and contents ↑

2. Discover recent papers and receive application advice

Enter general English topic terms that may be shared publicly and enable Recent literature checks. Only those explicit terms go to OpenAlex, not unpublished research text automatically extracted as a search query. Checks enter a queue on a nominal 30-minute per-goal cadence and retrieve up to 25 results published in the past 14 days. Indexing delays, provider limits and queue load mean neither instant discovery nor exhaustive coverage is guaranteed. Discovered literature shows the last successful check and pending analysis count. Also enable automatic application advice/strategy to compare papers with your evidence and suggest an application, decisive experiment and limitations. A new-paper alert is created only when the analysis identifies concrete application value. Discovery alone uses no AI allowance.

Back to search and contents ↑

3. Assess what can be done before your deadline

Enter a question such as “Suggest a paper and essential experiments feasible within ten days” and choose Strategy analysis. It uses bounded excerpts from currently accessible stored material, reports, personal notes and action results. With literature checks enabled it also searches earlier relevant work using the same public terms. Supported official venue/publisher HTML pages can supply a submission-guidance excerpt. Unread links and papers without full text remain explicit coverage limitations; registering a URL does not verify the rules. The report examines claims, prior-work differences, counter-evidence, decisive experiments, resources, critical path, fallback scope and potential overlap between papers. Feasible, conditional, rescope and evidence-needed are AI assessments, not acceptance probabilities. Indexes such as KCI and Scopus are not a single research-quality ranking.

Back to search and contents ↑

4. Control analysis cost and notifications

Enable literature checks and automatic AI separately for each goal. Background analysis shares your personal allowance and must satisfy both a daily background cap and a reserve for manual use. Defaults are one background analysis and one reserved manual attempt per day. When allowance is unavailable, discovered papers remain stored for later analysis. A new analysis is marked as one attempt; reopening matching saved results needs no additional AI. Failed started attempts follow the existing quota policy. Quiet hours use your Today’s research notification timezone. Daily digests combine ready suggestions after the selected hour; later arrivals wait until the next day. Email also requires existing email preferences and a configured sender; push requires a registered device and enabled notification category. Archiving a goal stops future discovery/automatic analysis while retaining its history.

Back to search and contents ↑

5. Move from a report to plans and actions

Open Evidence and application from Research suggestions to inspect numbered citations and the source list. Act under Next actions opens the existing action editor; review and approve the destination and content before an external comment or message is posted. Add to today’s plan appends the summary and actions without replacing existing notes. Adopt marks personal intent to use a suggestion, not paper acceptance or experimental completion. Use Already in progress, Show next week or Not interested to manage suggestions. Saved proposals inform AI consultation and plan/review drafts while remaining distinct from confirmed results. Subsequent execution results and new research records are reconsidered during later strategy analysis.

Back to search and contents ↑

6. Recurring reviews, history and ChatGPT

Choose daily, every three days, weekly or fortnightly reviews. When automatic analysis is enabled, targets within seven days of the deadline are considered daily; changed internal evidence is reconsidered at least a day after the preceding analysis. New-paper analyses share the same personal cap. Earlier reports remain in the goal’s version history. The ChatGPT connector can read saved goals/reports and prepare goal or personal-setting changes and a strategy analysis. Commit only after approving the exact review and cost. Poll the same goal to read analysis status instead of creating another request. External publication still needs the existing separate action preview and approval. If tools are unavailable, check reconnection and granted scopes.

Back to search and contents ↑

7. Missing or delayed results

If a successful check finds nothing, broaden the public topic terms. Provider errors retain the last successful timestamp and retry on the next check. Papers waiting for analysis require automatic analysis enabled, sufficient cap/reserve and a working AI connection. Failed analysis retains the underlying evidence; correct the conditions and request analysis again. Changing project scope or source permissions may hide earlier reports; analyze the current scope again. Background discovery and analysis require the server worker to be running. The web page need not remain open.

Back to search and contents ↑

8. Paper categories and counting

In Paper targets, select a year and View, then Add target. Choose KIISE conferences, SCI(E)/SCIE, Scopus, KCI or Custom and enter a submission count. Details hold the venue, official tier and edition, Q1 field, KCI candidate inclusion, main conference/workshop and reference link. These are user-defined criteria, not automatically verified accreditation. Keep one goal per manuscript and choose one primary annual counting category. Edit that same goal for resubmission, retaining its first submission date. Enter only confirmed submission, acceptance and publication dates; undated legacy stages are excluded from counts. Changing years preserves earlier settings and dates. Removing a target row removes only that annual target, not research records.

Back to search and contents ↑

9. AI allowance examples

Under AI allowance, set the daily automatic cap and reserve for direct requests. With a total cap of 50, zero used, automatic cap five and reserve five, up to five automatic attempts are available. After 43 direct attempts, only two of the remaining seven can be automatic, leaving five. A total cap of five with a reserve of five stops automation. The reserve is not extra allowance and does not cap manual use. Automatic cap zero disables automation; reserve zero protects no allowance. Live calculations use the current usage snapshot and can change if you use AI elsewhere. The worker rechecks current quota and permissions.

Back to search and contents ↑

10. Help and notification settings

Click or tap ? beside a setting for its meaning and examples. Keyboard Enter opens it and Escape closes it. In Notifications, choose delivery after analysis or a daily digest. Digest time uses your personal time zone and actual delivery follows the worker schedule. Quiet hours take precedence; equal start and end times disable the quiet interval. This does not pause analysis. Email also requires personal email preferences and a platform sender; it uses no extra AI. Save paper targets separately from AI/notification settings. Concurrent changes require a reload instead of silently overwriting saved settings.

Back to search and contents ↑

11. Remove targets and record actual progress

New settings start with one target row. Add rows as needed; check Exclude this target and save to remove only the category. Uncheck before saving to undo. Existing targets are preserved. In Record progress, select the manuscript and enter owner-confirmed first submission, acceptance and publication dates. Each event counts once in its calendar year; a stage without a date is not counted. No external submission system automatically verifies these events. Reuse the same goal for resubmissions. Trashing a paper goal retains linked reports/code; restoration keeps automation off.

Back to search and contents ↑

12. Shared costs and detailed dossiers

Only platform administrators control the shared public-analysis daily limit. Shared analysis of public papers/code has service cost but does not deduct personal AI attempts. Personalized strategy/code analysis uses personal quota. Expand Detailed report and downloads to set a maximum attempt budget for four saved report parts. Resume from saved parts after a budget stop or failure. Calls already started may still be charged after cancellation. Length and citation count follow available evidence; neither is padded with invented sources. ZIP includes Markdown, HTML, PDF, source JSON and BibTeX. Output examples are explicitly synthetic, not measured research, and cost no AI.

Back to search and contents ↑

13. Progress and ChatGPT

Pages show saved results first and poll a small status response about every eight seconds while active or thirty seconds while idle, pausing in hidden tabs. Open View new results to refresh saved output. Polling uses no AI. ChatGPT uses guidance from consultant_strategy_list, status/dossier reads, and the same prepare/commit approval contract for progress, trash/restore and dossier start/pause/resume. If the host does not expose these tools, refresh connection metadata; server support alone does not prove host availability. Download links require a current platform login.

Back to search and contents ↑

14. Connect existing context to a short question

Select grants/projects to include their purpose and constraints. The question editor supports mentions, document citations, Markdown tables and image/file attachments. Example: “Compare the model on page 6 with our project.” After saving, expand Research context to review the scope. Text extraction runs in the background after upload; analysis waits for pending inputs. Failed inputs can be retried. PDF text has extraction limits; the requested page or one question-relevant page is visually inspected. Check page numbers and omissions. Purpose, ideas, self-reports and validated results remain distinct; mentions do not send messages. Identify priority files/pages for large collections.

Back to search and contents ↑

15. Progress, original requests, resuming and daily review

Staged strategy analysis saves the original question before running four parts: literature comparison; question/contributions/scope; model/experiments/implementation; schedule/integrated strategy. The default maximum is four personal AI attempts, one per stage. A lower cap pauses after saving completed parts. Waiting for another job, attachments or personal allowance does not lose your question. The compact status shows the target, current stage and saved parts. Expand request history for manual/automatic origin, original question, timestamps and errors. Attachment preparation and analysis completion are counted separately. Intermediate stages save concise, focused parts before final integration. Each stage has an AI response limit of up to eight minutes and continues after closing the page; this is not an estimated completion time. Timeouts pause; retry the saved request or resume from saved parts. Changed conditions require a new request. Download partial results as ZIP or Continue discussion without overwriting the original. Reading costs no platform AI; new analysis and consultation use personal allowance. Automatic failures back off and stop after three consecutive failures for the same goal revision. Daily AI review considers accessible, date-bounded goals and annual-target changes, analysis attempts/results, code proposals, working revisions and decisions. Missing historical snapshots or bounded coverage are not represented as complete collection.

Back to search and contents ↑

Collaborate from a shared report

Use Share and collaborate on a strategy report to review content, recipients and read or follow-up permissions. Report ID and immutable edition ID/version preserve lineage. Original attachments, private chats and GitHub access are not automatically shared. Open Shared research reports, then start your own discussion or code workspace. Share a saved result with the team by selecting an exact revision/checkpoint/code result and files to return to the author. Seen, review and adoption are separate human actions. Sharing, reading and exporting make no AI call; new generation uses the initiating user’s allowance. Stable request IDs prevent duplicates. Revocation, expiry, withdrawal and project access changes affect subsequent access and continuation. Exported copies cannot be recalled. Notion queues a fixed edition under an authorized parent; unknown outcomes never auto-retry. Reconcile the existing page by ID. External researchers must first complete existing account and lab/project participation approval; member rollout is not automatically enabled.

Back to search and contents ↑

Active work, archives and deletion

The live strip shows queued/running requests only. Analysis archives separate attention, completed, cancelled/failed and trash; saved outputs remain downloadable. Cancel before moving active work to trash; restore never resumes automatically. Permanent deletion requires an exact scope review and current permission, and rejects references from later consultations/code. Original attachments and usage totals remain. Old encrypted backups are not immediately erased; reapply the latest deletion ledger after restoration. ChatGPT uses consultant_strategy_prepare analysis_trash/analysis_restore/analysis_purge and commit.

Back to search and contents ↑

Complete literature and report history

Goal settings precede research context. Paginate all literature/search observations and reports. Deduplicated literature and per-search snapshots are separate; legacy observations have unknown original search batches. Only the final analysis stage creates a final report; partial results remain on the request. Compare two saved reports without AI. ChatGPT strategy_read collection=reports/literature/observations with goal,page reads the same lists.

Back to search and contents ↑

Analysis continuity and ChatGPT

New strategy analyses default to prior reports, feedback, saved follow-up decisions and recent discussions for the same goal. Originals remain available; bounded excerpts and omissions are recorded for model input. Independent analysis excludes prior analysis context. Revoked evidence is never reused. Code consultation from a report, section or action retains source provenance. ChatGPT resumes the same request ID and checkpoints; completed work uses follow-up analysis. analysis with status=true returns small metadata. Review strategy_prepare acknowledge with kind/id/version before commit. If the host exposes an old limit or missing operations, refresh the connected tools and read the central policy.

Back to search and contents ↑

Synchronizing external discussion and code results

Each code workspace has one representative notice across preparation, AI and validation steps. Dismiss preserves failures and does not mark them successful. Link a strategy report under Sources and links; the report also links back to derived code. External results preserve the question, answer, files, provenance, versions and downloads. Ask ChatGPT or Codex to continue this LUNA workspace and save the answer and files to the same workspace. Only a ready storage receipt confirms synchronization. Conversations or temporary files never delivered to LUNA are not automatically imported. You can also paste an answer and select files in the platform. Conversation text is limited to 120 KB, files to 100 files and 8 MB total; retry with identical files and request identity to resume. Files are not executed; model and test claims are producer-reported. Revisions preserve previous results. Storage uses no new AI call but consumes storage and backup capacity. Encrypted rejected responses may be revalidated without AI for up to 24 hours; invalid responses remain failures. Execution/resume settings start collapsed.

Back to search and contents ↑

Evidence access and analysis recovery

Analysis detail shows unavailable evidence counts and Google reauthorization status. Open the linked connection, personally authorize Google, wait for collection, then check access again. Authorization alone never restores historical access. Reuse saved stages only after a new authorized collection confirms the same file, version and content. Changed content or revoked access keeps old results preserved but restricted. Review a new analysis with accessible evidence to create a separate four-stage request after reviewing the original question, budget and timeout. Blocked source text and old outputs are not copied; new calls consume the existing personal allowance. Preview/status reads never run AI. ChatGPT uses strategy_read analysis diagnosis and the exact strategy_prepare analysis_recover / strategy_commit review contract.

Back to search and contents ↑

Enable or disable automation for a goal

Use the automation control at the top of a paper goal without deleting it. Conditions are collapsed by default. Periodic review offers None, daily, every three days, weekly and fortnightly. None disables periodic review only; new literature, changed evidence and deadlines within seven days are independent triggers. Disable automation to stop every automatic trigger. Literature discovery is separate and does not consume personal AI attempts. Disabling cancels unstarted automatic requests; a started call may incur its existing cost and save a validated result before stopping. Manual analyses, reports, literature and history remain. Enabling or changing conditions schedules future work without replaying missed periods. Allowance waits, failure holds and running states are distinguished; the next review time is an estimate. Ask ChatGPT or AI consultation to disable automation for the goal. consultant_strategy_read returns automation and its revision; prepare(operation=goal, values={automation_revision, automation:{automatic:false}}), review the exact change, then commit updates the same policy. Actual host tool exposure must be verified separately. Reading and saving policy do not execute an AI analysis.

Back to search and contents ↑

Preserving accumulated literature and search history

Editing goal settings preserves discovered papers, analysis links and observations. Titles and deadlines do not change the search revision; changing search terms does. Accumulated literature is the default, with filters for current, earlier or unknown settings, recent discovery, analysis availability and relevance review, paginated by 20. Unknown historical search terms are never inferred. Prioritize, select by relevance and exclude apply to future analyses without deleting previous results. Reassess relevance after changing the question or research scope. Reads and selection saves spend no AI allowance; automatic analysis consent is separate. consultant_strategy_read(goal) returns the same library in ChatGPT and AI consultation. prepare(operation=goal, values={literature:{operation:list,filter:all,page:1}}) is read-only. For changes, use literature operation=select, paper, inclusion(auto/include/exclude) and revision, review, then commit. Search observations retain the actual terms and settings.

Back to search and contents ↑

3. Sharing, Notion and printing

Use the top share icon for team sharing or Notion publication. Find recipients by name and use ? for field help. For Notion, select an allowed parent and review the body before queuing publication. Configure a connection if none is available. Notion audiences are independent. The export icon provides full-body print, PDF and Markdown. An uncertain publication is reconciled, never blindly reposted.

Back to search and contents ↑

4. ChatGPT and AI consultation

Connected tools support reading a goal workflow and recording notes or imported results. Use the lifecycle envelope inside consultant_thread_prepare save, followed by reviewed commit for changes. Only transmitted content is saved. Reads and record writes do not invoke extra AI or remote experiments; new consultation follows existing usage policy.

Back to search and contents ↑

4. Continue across AI surfaces

  1. Use ▾ beside the send button in either a new or follow-up request to choose: Answer in this work, Continue in AI chat, or Continue in ChatGPT.
  2. Selecting a destination runs no AI. Answer in this work sends the request. Continue in AI chat prepares your final question, selected evidence and files in the consultation panel; review and send there to start.
  3. Continue in ChatGPT prepares handoff text. Copy it into ChatGPT with LUNA connected. Copying alone neither transfers nor saves anything externally.
  4. Reuse the same work and conversation for the same purpose. New work is created on actual send; switching a prepared request’s destination must not run it twice.
  5. Only delivered and saved content and files are preserved. Check the receipt’s work ID, files and download links. Choosing a destination does not broaden private conversation access or sharing.
Back to search and contents ↑

7. Core materials and AI drafts

  1. Search and pin important sources in Materials & results. Pinning and unpinning do not copy, delete or change source access.
  2. Private pins enter only your own AI context; team sources still require current source permissions. Attach relevant evidence and choose Ask AI to save a request on the same work.
  3. Choose Save note to preserve a private memo without AI; it does not replace the current result. Waiting, running and failure reflect actual request state; saved stages remain preserved.
  4. AI requests follow administrator policy and personal limits. Reading, saving notes and pinning make no new generation call.
  5. Pins and AI drafts are not factual verification or researcher approval.
Back to search and contents ↑

10. Find earlier analyses and results

  1. Existing goals, code, reports and discussions retain their original IDs and permissions while being linked into one work list. Open work or search Materials & results for originals and downloads.
  2. The current revision and latest saved checkpoint represent a conversation; earlier versions remain in detailed history. Distinct reports are not merged by matching titles.
  3. If evidence is inaccessible, the owner may see only a preserved-result notice. Restore current connection and permissions before opening content or downloads.
  4. Never infer or claim to have read blocked content. A classification-only change with identical content, version, connection and current access does not require regenerating saved results.
Back to search and contents ↑

11. One work list and research map

  1. Choose List or Research map in Research work. Selecting work opens the right panel. Use ↗ or Ctrl/⌘-click to open the same work on its own page with a stable URL. The default map groups results inside their owning work; Expand outputs reveals exact report and code-result cards.
  2. Renaming work changes its display name without rewriting source titles, content, versions or evidence, or duplicating work. Distinct works are never merged by title.
  3. Solid workflow/derivation links and dashed reference/validation links are both visible by default. Multiple origins, references and sections retain their exact report IDs and versions even when output cards are folded.
  4. Counts distinguish the works, outputs and materials currently shown, not the total saved collection. Use the next work range or a focused neighborhood to navigate.
  5. Renaming or reordering the list does not reposition the same works and relationships. Goal settings, literature, strategy analysis and specialized code tools remain available from that work’s settings or detail screen.
  6. Source changes require deliberate evidence review and refresh. Disconnecting does not delete the source or earlier history.
  7. Maps, search and opening a work URL call no AI and create no work or conversation. The panel and separate page use the same work, current permissions, conversation, results, files and history.
  8. While drafting, use ↗ to open a new tab. Unsent text and selected files remain in the original tab. Open in research space returns to that work. Use the original tab to resume its search, map position and draft.
Back to search and contents ↑

12. Trash and a new research cycle

  1. Review the target and effects before moving work or a space to Trash. Saved conversations, outputs, attachments and external originals remain preserved.
  2. A new cycle archives earlier work while retaining materials and members. Restore from Trash or previous cycles without automatically restoring work individually trashed earlier.
  3. Related local pending or running requests stop, but a call already sent to an external provider cannot be guaranteed recalled. Restoration itself queues no AI.
  4. Original automation policies remain preserved, so an enabled policy may execute at its next scheduled time after restoration.
Back to search and contents ↑

13. Navigate quickly and inspect history

  1. Switch between List and Map and sort by recent activity, creation, execution state, attention or title. Changing work loads its detail in place and retains the draft question for each work.
  2. Open Records and filter All, Conversation, Results and versions, Executions or Links. An answer and its result are grouped.
  3. A conversation started from an earlier report or selected passage retains its original thread. Load earlier records on demand.
  4. No execution requested, generating and needs attention describe execution separately from saved outputs. Downloads require actually preserved files.
Back to search and contents ↑

14. Save naturally from a conversation

  1. Ask the AI consultation or ChatGPT: “Save this conversation and its results to the current research work.” LUNA prioritizes an explicit work, the bound conversation and a previous save receipt. Choose by title when several targets match, or preserve privately in the personal inbox before selecting a destination.
  2. New work requires an explicit request; retrying the same request does not duplicate it. Review the destination, content and files before saving.
  3. The personal inbox supports downloads and linking to existing work. Saving text makes no additional platform model call.
  4. Files can be uploaded in resumable chunks up to 8 MB per bundle; larger materials may be saved as accessible source references. A source link is not a preserved binary copy.
  5. Check the completed save receipt: uploading means only received parts are preserved. External messages and files that were never delivered are not automatically collected.
  6. Team sharing and external publication retain separate scope reviews.
Back to search and contents ↑

15. Full-width map and images

  1. The map uses the full work area. Derivation and dependency relations guide its left-to-right layout, including independent work and loops.
  2. Select a node for detail and return to the same map position. More offers PNG, JPEG and SVG exports of the currently loaded range, not a claim to cover every record.
  3. No AI call is made.
Back to search and contents ↑

16. Attach files and use code results

  1. Use Add materials for files, images and platform evidence; paste links into your question. Upload up to 50 files totaling 100 MB through resumable chunks.
  2. Originals are preserved while AI excerpts are prepared in the background. Preparation is not a full read of every original; extraction failures and text or image limits are shown separately.
  3. Actually completed ChatGPT file transfers can be attached with the same permission checks. Missing code output has no download; execution history shows the failure.
  4. Import preserved text code or a validated ZIP as a code changeset and inspect each diff. ZIPs are never executed or automatically installed.
  5. Review repository, branch, baseline commit and changes before approving GitHub publication. Reconcile uncertain responses to avoid duplicate posts.
Back to search and contents ↑

17. Keep existing work in My saved items

  1. Star existing work, conversations or results to keep a shortcut in My saved items. This differs from a preserved copy of delivered conversation content and files.
  2. Shortcuts reopen the same work and version; source permission revocation blocks content access. Web, AI consultation and ChatGPT use the same bookmarks and save receipts.
Back to search and contents ↑

18. One library and pinned materials

  1. Use All, Favorites and Saved conversations and files in one personal library. Old favorite URLs and folders remain valid.
  2. Unstarring does not delete preserved originals. Materials and results initially shows pinned items; search includes all accessible materials.
  3. Toggle the same pin to unpin and clear search to return to pins. Pinning does not expand source permissions.
Back to search and contents ↑

19. Private work and team discussion

  1. Click Only me on a work item to manage sharing. Review the exact body and selected files before sharing.
  2. Earlier private discussions and personal memory are not shared automatically. Continue in team view to accumulate attributed discussion under the same canonical research work.
  3. Sharing withdrawal, membership and source access are rechecked; private originals remain preserved. ChatGPT uses the same work ID and current permissions and reflects only delivered content.
Back to search and contents ↑

20. Add schedules and export maps

  1. Use Add to choose an event, GitHub task or report request and then create or link existing. Creation opens the standard form with optional AI drafting.
  2. Linking does not duplicate the original or create an external item. Select one image format before downloading a map.
  3. Dashed reference and validation relations identify evidence or verification links, separately from derivation order.
Back to search and contents ↑

24. Refine a request through conversation

  1. Write a few sentences in New research or Continue this work, then select sources and files in Add materials. Put links in the text. Both composers use the same refinement, attachment and destination controls.
  2. Refine request opens a conversation on the right. It checks the current request, work and selected evidence, suggests a research kind and identifies missing conditions. It reuses known conditions and asks one or two important questions at a time.
  3. A choice fills the reply box. Add or edit details, then choose Send reply. You may leave a condition undecided or ask for a recommendation. Repository candidates are authorized connection metadata, not proof of write permission or server availability.
  4. Preview the prepared request and conditions, distinguishing your input, existing evidence, AI suggestions and unknowns. The composer changes only when you choose Apply to request. Undo restores your earlier input.
  5. Applying does not execute research. Edit the result if needed, choose this work, AI consultation or ChatGPT from the destination menu, then send. You may also skip refinement and send directly.
  6. Closing and reopening preserves the saved conversation. On mobile, closing returns to the original composer. An older response never automatically overwrites text you changed.
  7. Starting refinement and sending each additional reply request one personal AI attempt each. Page reads, saved conversation reads and applying use no AI. Closing the panel does not cancel an already accepted AI job.
  8. Administrator policy, remaining allowance, provider and time limits apply. Failures retain input and conversation without automatic paid retries. Up to 50 files totaling 100 MB are supported; uploading is distinct from analyzing all original content.
  9. Selecting a saved suggestion only fills the request and evidence; Save memo stores a record without AI. Team requests use only currently authorized shared evidence.
Back to search and contents ↑

25. Continue request drafts and results in ChatGPT

  1. You can hand off a rough request without finishing refinement on the website. Choose Continue in ChatGPT from the destination menu for either a new request or a follow-up.
  2. The handoff includes the latest composer text, selected sources, prepared attachments and existing work, conversation and result versions. An applied refinement also carries the same request session and accepted revision. Preparing and copying the handoff calls no AI, creates no work and transfers nothing externally.
  3. Paste the text into ChatGPT with LUNA connected and check that the host exposes the needed tools. Ask: “First clarify the request by asking for missing conditions; proceed after we settle it.”
  4. Preserve the same request session, work and evidence versions when saving a request refined in ChatGPT. Saving externally prepared requests and results does not rerun platform AI. Draft storage, applying a request and executing research remain separate actions.
  5. Ask: “Save the discussion delivered so far and the generated files to this work, then show download links.” The platform preserves only conversation content and files actually delivered through its tools, not the entire external chat automatically.
  6. A filename or temporary link is not proof of preservation. Check the receipt destination, file list, downloads and readiness. Use web upload if the host cannot deliver files.
  7. Confirm a destination for new work and retain the existing work, conversation and exact result version for follow-ups. Continue through the stable work link; include the exact result or version link when reviewing a specific output. Opening a link does not save drafts, external conversations or files. Private conversations and evidence do not become team-shared automatically. Publication and paid GPU execution have separate scopes.
Back to search and contents ↑

33. Automatic recommendations and usage

  1. Open space settings in Research team to turn automatic research recommendations on or off. Existing and new spaces default to on, preparing suggestions from existing reports and consultations.
  2. Opening pages, reading suggestions, searching and sorting make no new AI call. Relevant saved results refresh recommendations in the background; the first view shows saved suggestions.
  3. Additional automatic AI enrichment defaults to zero attempts. Set a daily cap if needed; the space owner’s allowance and administrator policy also apply. Changing settings never resets consumed usage.
  4. Turning off stops subsequent automatic recommendation generation while preserving existing suggestions and history. Pending work rechecks the setting and permissions immediately before execution.
  5. Private consultation or source recommendations are not automatically shared with other members. Changed or revoked evidence requires revalidation. Preparing a suggestion does not execute research, prove success or constitute human review.
Back to search and contents ↑

34. Compact cards and work search

  1. Open titles in the Projects and Research spaces sections of a grant or project. The directory uses the same cards without repeating a parent already shown.
  2. Work and result counts use currently accessible entries. A work’s conversation, report and execution history are not counted as separate work. A + marks a bounded count.
  3. Choose List or Map and type to search Research work. Search waits for composition to finish; Enter searches immediately. Use the compact sort menu for recent activity, creation, status and other criteria.
  4. Searching and changing views preserve the draft and selected work. Renaming work or adjusting map relations retains the same work ID and history.
Back to search and contents ↑

35. Research kinds, requests and results

  1. A research kind describes the activity: planning, literature review, model design, experiment design, code implementation, training, validation, reproducibility, analysis, discussion, writing, reporting or scheduling. Reports, code files and literature tables are result formats.
  2. AI proposes a kind during refinement. Direct requests receive an initial classification; use Change research kind in the work menu to correct it. Manual choices are never overwritten automatically.
  3. Every work uses Request, Results and Continue this work, in that order. Expand long requests and open or download results. Find initial requests, conversation, execution and earlier versions in History under the work menu.
  4. Changing kind preserves sources, results and permissions; it does not authorize server execution or GitHub writes. Distinguish a training plan from actual training and a validation plan from completed validation.
Back to search and contents ↑

36. Continue earlier goals and literature

  1. Earlier paper-goal settings and discovered literature can be organized as a separate preparation work. Read its research objective and conditions as the request, and open the literature bundle as its result.
  2. The literature result includes search and observation history, selection state and sources. Open or download it, distinguishing reorganized existing records from new AI analysis.
  3. Earlier strategy and detailed-report IDs, conversations, reports, citations and downloads remain intact. Linking preparation as the logical starting point never invents historical runs or conversations.
  4. Earlier settings and literature URLs lead to the preparation work. Its automatic execution settings retain the earlier policy; reorganization does not resume stopped AI or incur additional AI charges.
  5. Renaming work never creates another map node for the same work. Work and result artifacts remain distinct; expand result versions when needed.
Back to search and contents ↑

Still need help?

Include the page, time, steps and error message. Leave out passwords, tokens and private research text.

Contact support →